Was supplied by D Neville, ecclesiastical outfitters, John Dalton Street, Manchester latterly Henry Barrie, Schools Outfitters, Manchester
UNIFORM LIST AND PRICES
Magenta was the (tie) colour at Rt Rev Mgr McGuiness's former College at Cambridge - Downing, - hence its inclusion in this uniform
|
Caps - Navy striped in magentaOptional (very! but useful for goalposts!) |
Pullover V neckNavy neckline and cuffs outlined in magenta |
|
|
|
Gaberdine Raincoat "Robert Hirst" - Compulsory between the declaration of winter and the declaration of summer (then only necessary on days of inclement weather) About 1994, the Crombie overcoat became an officially recognised alternative despite being the uniform of another 'organisation' at that time. This was as a result of advice by the "School Council" |
Trousers Grey, long or short |
Uniform was compulsory. Arrival without a tie would result in the pupil being sent home immediately to fetch it regardless of distance (unless first saved by the school office with the loan of a spare one).
The headmaster organised a catwalk of two pupils for the parents of prospective first years, the first wearing an immaculately pressed school uniform, the second wearing an old dirty anorak. The parents were then asked which boy's appearance they preferred!
Haircut was short. any pupil arriving with hair longer than that which the headmaster regarded appropriate would be dispatched forthwith to the local barber with a loan from the school to pay the bill! This memory is unsubstantiated by sixth form photos - maybe tolerance had increased by then.
On Uniform:"Allow me now to mention another matter- which I rarely need to mention, so unanimous is the cooperation and understanding of our parents. Unless I am greatly mistaken, we are all agreed that this is a uniformwearing school, and I think it would lose some at least of its attraction for most of you if it ceased to be such a school. Indeed, I have never met any parent or student who would object in general to the school uniform: the only difficulty we ever have is with certain individuals who, no doubt, thoughtlessly, and with many other problems to solve, demand some concessions, some change in the uniform, for their own immediate convenience, which they would not demand for everyone else. I am thinking particularly and in this cold weather you may think it a topical thought of outdoor clothing. One observes with concern the appearance of a variety of garments which are clearly nonuniform, and I must put it to you that it would take not a majority, but only a minority of thoughtless parents to turn this school into one with virtually no uniform. Rather than be accused of opposition to road safety, I normally refrain from comment at the outdoor garments worn by cyclists. (Luminous clothing seems defensible enough, but how a khaki anorak is more visible than a blue one is hard to understand.) It must at least be understood that all cyclists if they wish to go with their schoolfellows on any excursion for which uniform is worn, e.g. to see a Play, or a Concert, during school hours, must wear the same outdoor clothing as the others.One observes also with surprise a perceptible increase in anoraks and parkas, particularly amongst our younger pupils. Some of us find it difficult to understand why our boys should be attracted to clothes which make them look like primary schoolchildren, at a primary school which has no uniform. All parents who have purchased the recommended "Robert Hirst" raincoat agree that it is hardwearing as well as attractive. Those who think it too expensive are, of course, at liberty to obtain any raincoat which will ensure that their son looks as though he attends the same school as the others, Let me remind you also that Henry Barrie supply a Navyblue Crombie overcoat which is perfectly acceptable for school wear and which many may prefer during the winter. We omitted to mention it in the last list of school uniform, probably because the previous winter had been rather mild." (letter to parents 1977). |

Uniform possibly may have not been enforced as rigidly on day 1, 1965?